Comments on: Clifford’s Principle, pt. 2 http://kevin.vandekrol.com/entry/050 The knowledge of God is very far from the love of Him. Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:36:16 -0400 hourly 1 By: Stephen http://kevin.vandekrol.com/entry/050/comment-page-1#comment-128 Stephen Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:34:52 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=58#comment-128 Excellent thoughts! The way you tied it up at the end matched my thoughts on the topic. An interesting quote I've heard is, "truth is more important than God." Strange quote...but all it is saying is that we must find truth, and if we find God to be truth, we can then follow Him. I agree with Grant on carbon dating and such. What a joke. I wonder how many variables are not accounted for in carbon dating. Also, they'll only use it in publications if the answer supports their theory. If not, they will omit it. "This attitude is clearly reflected in a regrettably common practice: when a radiocarbon date agrees with the expectations of the excavator it appears in the main text of the site report; if it is slightly discrepant it is relegated to a footnote; if it seriously conflicts it is left out altogether." http://www.allaboutarchaeology.org/is-carbon-dating-accurate-faq.htm Excellent thoughts! The way you tied it up at the end matched my thoughts on the topic. An interesting quote I’ve heard is, “truth is more important than God.” Strange quote…but all it is saying is that we must find truth, and if we find God to be truth, we can then follow Him.

I agree with Grant on carbon dating and such. What a joke. I wonder how many variables are not accounted for in carbon dating. Also, they’ll only use it in publications if the answer supports their theory. If not, they will omit it.

“This attitude is clearly reflected in a regrettably common practice: when a radiocarbon date agrees with the expectations of the excavator it appears in the main text of the site report; if it is slightly discrepant it is relegated to a footnote; if it seriously conflicts it is left out altogether.”

http://www.allaboutarchaeology.org/is-carbon-dating-accurate-faq.htm

]]> By: Lori http://kevin.vandekrol.com/entry/050/comment-page-1#comment-125 Lori Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:32:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=58#comment-125 worth the wait, Kevin! Thank you! worth the wait, Kevin! Thank you!

]]> By: grant http://kevin.vandekrol.com/entry/050/comment-page-1#comment-124 grant Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:38:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=58#comment-124 Brooks the other shoe has been dropped! I find it interesting that what some peoples "facts" are are completely made up theories about something that happened when no one was there...according to them. Yet they prove their theories with things like carbon dating, which is a completely manipulatable measurement tool. Brooks the other shoe has been dropped! I find it interesting that what some peoples “facts” are are completely made up theories about something that happened when no one was there…according to them. Yet they prove their theories with things like carbon dating, which is a completely manipulatable measurement tool.

]]>